Yes.
Maybe.
Pagyra has writtenNo.
Discussion About Moderators
Pagyra has written
Pagyra.
Avo(but in fact isn't active) and you(
Pagyra) that are really good man for moderator.
KimKat You're still ****. No, I can't say it because you will* ban me by pissed off*.
DC. You made my day
§3.1 - No posts which offend/provoke/insult (flame)
Pagyra: In my opinion, Avobolt and kemine are worth to be but they're pretty inactive especially kemine so i don't know what i choose. Anyway, the situation here is not really worse or there's lack so we don't need other moderators for now.
Anomaly: He banned you by fuck? What the hell? No details please! It's exactly that kind of offensive behavior which gets you banned (I'm just judging from your last post, I don't know what happened before). Always search mistakes in your own behavior first before you complain about others.
DC: so, Let
KimKat embrace first and don't give a fu*k for
Pagyra.
Pagyra: New moderators come up when there's a lack of them or if current moderators cannot work properly (like having studies that take away all their time and so on). I haven't seen any moderators claim how they don't have enough time and the few of us who do moderate the forum don't have that much work. Getting a new moderator isn't viable right now. At least that's what I think.
Anomaly: Sorry but, I dont wanna to be moderator - I already have so many jobs, projects and employment - so i dont know where I would take free time and desire to engage and finish it all.
Rainoth: and @
DC: Today I spoke with @
Vectarrio: by Skype and he told me that he was/is busy by studying and therefore such bad activity.
GeoB99 because he seeks to get this rank, No that he told it someone but I see it.
Pagyra a̶l̶s̶o̶ ̶i̶s̶ ̶g̶o̶o̶d̶ ̶m̶a̶n̶ ̶w̶h̶i̶c̶h̶ ̶s̶h̶o̶u̶l̶d̶ ̶h̶o̶l̶d̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶r̶a̶n̶k̶.̶
.
Pagyra:
Rainoth has written
DC maybe) that I shouldn't remove older files so I don't usually do that. If there's a particular file that you want to see removed, you can always PM me and if you see a bad file uploaded but not removed, that's because I always give it 2-3 weeks for it to get feedback from other users which helps me decide whether I should remove it or not.
Pagyra has written
Pagyra did a rule violation. He provoked on a forum topic which is not very nice. It's also a valid rule in Unreal Software, so of course I will give him the temp ban if he does something like that. Provocations on forum topics will always get you a temp ban depending on the severity of the violators statement of course and also with accordance to the rules. I never give out temp bans if someone is doing the right thing.
Anomaly: I don't feel like I have to defend myself as the rule violation is valid and I also messaged him with the reason behind it, so why do you need to argue about a rule violation if I may ask? it's not you who violated anything it's him. No disrespect but I don't feel like I need to defend myself on this point.


KimKat and
Yates) to do a simple task to check and test my code - they repeatedly promised me do it, but later did not (even a month later (despite availability of free time)).
Pagyra: Your signature contained provocations towards me, so I resetted it because of that. It's also self-explanatory, now thank you and have a nice day.
KimKat, IMHO, giving full 4 week ban for such trifling thing is not fair so i removed it.
useigor has written
KimKat, IMHO, giving full 4 week ban for such trifling thing is not fair so i removed it.
useigor.
KimKat: and @
Pagyra: , you can continue your ̶s̶t̶u̶p̶i̶d̶ ̶b̶r̶a̶i̶n̶l̶e̶s̶s̶ ̶f̶l̶a̶m̶e̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶l̶i̶t̶t̶l̶e̶ ̶c̶h̶i̶l̶d̶s̶ very interesting speech in PM. I think I say for all of us we are tired to see dat thing here, even in a offtopic section.
§2.4 - Use tags sparingly and only when they add value
Pagyra's PM to
KimKat: What a nonsense! Of course the rules are valid for the entire website. Including signatures. Why should it be allowed to flame in signatures while it is forbidden in the forum? That would render the rules completely useless.